<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Some blokes don&#8217;t take apart valve amps for fun</title> <atom:link href="http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/</link> <description>Busking this at Embankment Tube tomorrow</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: John Burscough</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-63608</link> <dc:creator>John Burscough</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:53:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-63608</guid> <description>There were 200 issues in all, which stacked tenfold under a (presumably) single bed wouldn&#039;t have left much room for Penthouses.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were 200 issues in all, which stacked tenfold under a (presumably) single bed wouldn&#8217;t have left much room for Penthouses.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vendor of Quack Nostrums</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-63527</link> <dc:creator>Vendor of Quack Nostrums</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-63527</guid> <description>I&#039;d always fancied that it might be a gun, but due to my ignorance of all things military had never really been motivated to check. (Omni? - Uzi? Stacked? - err, as in packing an Uzi - stacking an Omni perhaps.  Tenfold? - ummm, he had 10 of them?)  Ok, in the cold light of day that doesn&#039;t make much sense does it?
Nevermind. It&#039;s always nice to learn something new.  Apparently Omni was a stablemate of Penthouse and was originally going to be called Nova.  Super.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d always fancied that it might be a gun, but due to my ignorance of all things military had never really been motivated to check. (Omni? &#8211; Uzi? Stacked? &#8211; err, as in packing an Uzi &#8211; stacking an Omni perhaps.  Tenfold? &#8211; ummm, he had 10 of them?)  Ok, in the cold light of day that doesn&#8217;t make much sense does it?</p><p>Nevermind. It&#8217;s always nice to learn something new.  Apparently Omni was a stablemate of Penthouse and was originally going to be called Nova.  Super.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Exford</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-63519</link> <dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:14:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-63519</guid> <description>A post in another thread prompts me to confess that, after about two decades or something, I&#039;ve only just realised that OMNI is a magazine.
I had previously thought either his Sven Hassel Omni(bus) was stacked there, or that Omni-Stacking was some kind of self-assembly under-bed shelving system favoured by Trogs that I&#039;d never heard of. Or possibly both.
Not that I&#039;d ever thought about it that much really.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A post in another thread prompts me to confess that, after about two decades or something, I&#8217;ve only just realised that OMNI is a magazine.</p><p>I had previously thought either his Sven Hassel Omni(bus) was stacked there, or that Omni-Stacking was some kind of self-assembly under-bed shelving system favoured by Trogs that I&#8217;d never heard of. Or possibly both.</p><p>Not that I&#8217;d ever thought about it that much really.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-4823</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:55:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-4823</guid> <description>Sounds like &quot;and in my dreams....I&#039;ve taken you to Falkirk!&quot; which I think is an even better lyric *blows on fingers*</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like &#8220;and in my dreams&#8230;.I&#8217;ve taken you to Falkirk!&#8221; which I think is an even better lyric *blows on fingers*</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave F.</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-2473</link> <dc:creator>Dave F.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-2473</guid> <description>The lyric book has it as sideys. Capitalized for some reason.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lyric book has it as sideys. Capitalized for some reason.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris The Siteowner</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link> <dc:creator>Chris The Siteowner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:25:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-1289</guid> <description>Yes, it&#039;s more akin to &quot;monkey/monkeys&quot; than &quot;tidy/tidies&quot;, I guess. And indeed, a lone sideburn wouldn&#039;t look right.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s more akin to &#8220;monkey/monkeys&#8221; than &#8220;tidy/tidies&#8221;, I guess. And indeed, a lone sideburn wouldn&#8217;t look right.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Malkmoose</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-1283</link> <dc:creator>Steve Malkmoose</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:57:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-1283</guid> <description>Given that the a lone sideburn would be a &quot;sidey&quot;- as opposed to a &quot;sidie&quot; (which just doesnt look right!); the plural must be &quot;sideys&quot; rather than &quot;sidies&quot; unless of course I&#039;m a rank buffoon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that the a lone sideburn would be a &#8220;sidey&#8221;- as opposed to a &#8220;sidie&#8221; (which just doesnt look right!); the plural must be &#8220;sideys&#8221; rather than &#8220;sidies&#8221; unless of course I&#8217;m a rank buffoon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: grim</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link> <dc:creator>grim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:37:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-1234</guid> <description>Mad sidies for me as well, or sideys if you prefer; although I admit I heard it as &quot;my tidies&quot; for a number of baffled years before finally working it out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mad sidies for me as well, or sideys if you prefer; although I admit I heard it as &#8220;my tidies&#8221; for a number of baffled years before finally working it out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris The Siteowner</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link> <dc:creator>Chris The Siteowner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:51:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-1232</guid> <description>OK, I suppose all we need to agree on is the spelling. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I suppose all we need to agree on is the spelling. <img
src='http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neil G</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/blokes-dont-valve-amps-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link> <dc:creator>Neil G</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:47:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=415#comment-1231</guid> <description>I&#039;m in the Mad Sidies camp.  There is a grammatical clue in the second verse where the subject of the sentence is the second person (i.e. you).  &quot;When you&#039;re a trog and you&#039;ve got... &quot; surely would be followed by &#039;your tidies&#039; if it were tidies.    Quite apart from that, I don&#039;t know what tidies are, sidies makes sense and it sounds like sidies to me.  And that&#039;s all I want to say about that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the Mad Sidies camp.  There is a grammatical clue in the second verse where the subject of the sentence is the second person (i.e. you).  &#8220;When you&#8217;re a trog and you&#8217;ve got&#8230; &#8221; surely would be followed by &#8216;your tidies&#8217; if it were tidies.    Quite apart from that, I don&#8217;t know what tidies are, sidies makes sense and it sounds like sidies to me.  And that&#8217;s all I want to say about that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
