<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: They can preach naked from the waist downwards</title> <atom:link href="http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/</link> <description>Busking this at Embankment Tube tomorrow</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:30:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: nickinko</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-20214</link> <dc:creator>nickinko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:59:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-20214</guid> <description>&#039;I have often malapopped in my malapops&#039;
A &#039;metamalapop&#039;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I have often malapopped in my malapops&#8217;</p><p>A &#8216;metamalapop&#8217;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Exford</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-20014</link> <dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:12:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-20014</guid> <description>And while I&#039;m at it I wish to coin the term &quot;malapopism&quot;. This should mean a comment in which one pedant has a pop at someone else for a grammatical, punctuational, lexical, syntactical or orthographic mistake, and in the process makes one or more such slips himself.
I have often malapopped in my malapops. I am often guilty of malapopism.
Not long now before malapop men are called Charlie.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And while I&#8217;m at it I wish to coin the term &#8220;malapopism&#8221;. This should mean a comment in which one pedant has a pop at someone else for a grammatical, punctuational, lexical, syntactical or orthographic mistake, and in the process makes one or more such slips himself.<br
/> I have often malapopped in my malapops. I am often guilty of malapopism.</p><p>Not long now before malapop men are called Charlie.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ricardo</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-20012</link> <dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:51:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-20012</guid> <description>We could be at each other&#039;s throats over this. *Does winky emoticon thing*</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could be at each other&#8217;s throats over this. *Does winky emoticon thing*</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Exford</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-20011</link> <dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:39:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-20011</guid> <description>But because they haven&#039;t got more than one arse each, and because Baal forbid we accuse NB57 of a grammatical slip, the only way around the conundrum for me is to think of it as the arses belonging to the others, and treat is as an unusual version of the conventional word order for a sentence meaning &quot;they each can smack others&#039; arses&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But because they haven&#8217;t got more than one arse each, and because Baal forbid we accuse NB57 of a grammatical slip, the only way around the conundrum for me is to think of it as the arses belonging to the others, and treat is as an unusual version of the conventional word order for a sentence meaning &#8220;they each can smack others&#8217; arses&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ricardo</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-20008</link> <dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:38:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-20008</guid> <description>There isn’t a quibble to be had, though, is there? I was always taught to treat “each other” as a singular pronoun, therefore it’s “each other’s arses”. You wouldn’t say “the arses belonging to each others”.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn’t a quibble to be had, though, is there? I was always taught to treat “each other” as a singular pronoun, therefore it’s “each other’s arses”. You wouldn’t say “the arses belonging to each others”.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris The Siteowner</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-20006</link> <dc:creator>Chris The Siteowner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:22:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-20006</guid> <description>I think it would be fun to put our quandary to one of those English Language forums and watch them quibble there.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be fun to put our quandary to one of those English Language forums and watch them quibble there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Exford</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-20004</link> <dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:40:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-20004</guid> <description>Yes you have. Which is why I say yes and no.
Because in a way no it shouldn&#039;t. &quot;Each other&#039;s arse&quot; is of course grammatically correct. But as they haven&#039;t both got more than one arse it&#039;s all pretty much up for grabs. As it were.
Or in other words you&#039;re probably right but not definitely, so let&#039;s quibble insanusly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you have. Which is why I say yes and no.</p><p>Because in a way no it shouldn&#8217;t. &#8220;Each other&#8217;s arse&#8221; is of course grammatically correct. But as they haven&#8217;t both got more than one arse it&#8217;s all pretty much up for grabs. As it were.</p><p>Or in other words you&#8217;re probably right but not definitely, so let&#8217;s quibble insanusly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nickinko</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-19986</link> <dc:creator>nickinko</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-19986</guid> <description>The apostrophe should be &#039;each other&#039;s arses&#039;, I think.
I have understood correctly that insane pedantry is actively encouraged here, haven&#039;t I?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The apostrophe should be &#8216;each other&#8217;s arses&#8217;, I think.</p><p>I have understood correctly that insane pedantry is actively encouraged here, haven&#8217;t I?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Godsy</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-8755</link> <dc:creator>Godsy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:58:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-8755</guid> <description>I hear &quot;I wanna bottle up my love&quot;, which I think makes more sense anyway. This orgasmic Christianity would be an ongoing emotion rather than a future action. Also come on Norfolk references!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear &#8220;I wanna bottle up my love&#8221;, which I think makes more sense anyway. This orgasmic Christianity would be an ongoing emotion rather than a future action. Also come on Norfolk references!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NIck Ink</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/they-can-preach-naked-from-the-waist-downwards/comment-page-1/#comment-3422</link> <dc:creator>NIck Ink</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:32:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=850#comment-3422</guid> <description>Love this song, hilarious.
nothing else to add, except a burning need to pop up now and again and say thanks for this site.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this song, hilarious.</p><p>nothing else to add, except a burning need to pop up now and again and say thanks for this site.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
