<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We would go and see Echo And The Bunny.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/</link>
	<description>Busking this at Embankment Tube tomorrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: giff</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-6005</link>
		<dc:creator>giff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 09:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-6005</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always thought it was:

&#039;though I&#039;m still mad at Trevor&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought it was:</p>
<p>&#8216;though I&#8217;m still mad at Trevor&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TWO FAT FEET</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-5497</link>
		<dc:creator>TWO FAT FEET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-5497</guid>
		<description>My apologies for the following.

Having an opinion on the quality of certain songs. I thought I&#039;d be entitled to it after nineteen years of being a fan.

My vagueness over the wine/vine thing, I admit I didn&#039;t look it up and it was only from my faint memory of a previous discussion of the matter, which did suggest the original song used the word &#039;vines&#039;. 

Fair cop, I got the timings of the last two albums back to front, I was thinking it was on CSI. I haven&#039;t listened to HMHB much over the last few years as I don&#039;t get as much opportunity these days and my CD collection is stuck under some boxes at the moment.

Finally apologies for not being part of the in-crowd, I&#039;m new to these parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies for the following.</p>
<p>Having an opinion on the quality of certain songs. I thought I&#8217;d be entitled to it after nineteen years of being a fan.</p>
<p>My vagueness over the wine/vine thing, I admit I didn&#8217;t look it up and it was only from my faint memory of a previous discussion of the matter, which did suggest the original song used the word &#8216;vines&#8217;. </p>
<p>Fair cop, I got the timings of the last two albums back to front, I was thinking it was on CSI. I haven&#8217;t listened to HMHB much over the last few years as I don&#8217;t get as much opportunity these days and my CD collection is stuck under some boxes at the moment.</p>
<p>Finally apologies for not being part of the in-crowd, I&#8217;m new to these parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Exford</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-5496</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-5496</guid>
		<description>It occurs to me TFF that when you come to appreciate (if you ever do) that certain words and groups of words can have more than one meaning simultaneously, often for humorous effect, you may rid yourself of the fallacy that HMHB songs can ever be either not as funny as their title, or indeed gag-free, and you may appreciate them all a lot more. 

Furthermore, if you have theories (e.g. lyrics of a song by another artiste that is being parodied) it often helps to firstly read the whole thread and/or look up on the internet  before you post. I have learned this the hard way myself. Ringo Starr sang &quot;lips like strawberry wine&quot;, by the way.

I do envy you one thing though, and that&#039;s your ability to wait excitedly for more than three and a half years after a song&#039;s appearance (by the sounds of it knowing the title all that time) to listen to it. Even JDOG could be a bit of an anti-climax after all that excited waiting. I can&#039;t wait to her what you&#039;ll make of the &quot;CSI&quot; LP when you get it. Father&#039;s Day 2011, maybe? 

Sorry but you do seem to have been asking for this since you appeared on here, and I thought I&#039;d wait and do it all in one post.

PS: are you the Rotherham Postie after too many Easter Eggs ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me TFF that when you come to appreciate (if you ever do) that certain words and groups of words can have more than one meaning simultaneously, often for humorous effect, you may rid yourself of the fallacy that HMHB songs can ever be either not as funny as their title, or indeed gag-free, and you may appreciate them all a lot more. </p>
<p>Furthermore, if you have theories (e.g. lyrics of a song by another artiste that is being parodied) it often helps to firstly read the whole thread and/or look up on the internet  before you post. I have learned this the hard way myself. Ringo Starr sang &#8220;lips like strawberry wine&#8221;, by the way.</p>
<p>I do envy you one thing though, and that&#8217;s your ability to wait excitedly for more than three and a half years after a song&#8217;s appearance (by the sounds of it knowing the title all that time) to listen to it. Even JDOG could be a bit of an anti-climax after all that excited waiting. I can&#8217;t wait to her what you&#8217;ll make of the &#8220;CSI&#8221; LP when you get it. Father&#8217;s Day 2011, maybe? </p>
<p>Sorry but you do seem to have been asking for this since you appeared on here, and I thought I&#8217;d wait and do it all in one post.</p>
<p>PS: are you the Rotherham Postie after too many Easter Eggs ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TWO FAT FEET</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-5494</link>
		<dc:creator>TWO FAT FEET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-5494</guid>
		<description>How should we interpret the title? Does it refer to &#039;wistful ruminations in my humble apartment&#039; or &#039;reverie in the key of A flat&#039;? 

I&#039;m not muso enough to be able to tell whether the latter would be musically accurate.

Don&#039;t worry, I&#039;ll shut up when I reach the top of the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How should we interpret the title? Does it refer to &#8216;wistful ruminations in my humble apartment&#8217; or &#8216;reverie in the key of A flat&#8217;? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not muso enough to be able to tell whether the latter would be musically accurate.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;ll shut up when I reach the top of the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s.g.d. a ShropshireLad</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>s.g.d. a ShropshireLad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>I think that it should be &quot;pick my life up&quot; and not &quot;picked&quot;.

p.s. Shrewsbury 25/03/2010

s.g.d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it should be &#8220;pick my life up&#8221; and not &#8220;picked&#8221;.</p>
<p>p.s. Shrewsbury 25/03/2010</p>
<p>s.g.d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-3255</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-3255</guid>
		<description>So he didn&#039;t die at all, this is where he went...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/world_agenda/article6821807.ece

Now that is good contortionism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So he didn&#8217;t die at all, this is where he went&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/world_agenda/article6821807.ece">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/world_agenda/article6821807.ece</a></p>
<p>Now that is good contortionism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Exford</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-2016</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-2016</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always assumed Lech Walesa&#039;s to be comedy rhyming slang for Marks&#039; , which would make it more likely to require an apostophe than a plural. There is absolutely no way of proving this, but it just fits in with the feel of a song where the playing-with-various-daft-ways-of-rhyming-or-not-rhyming quotient is higher than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always assumed Lech Walesa&#8217;s to be comedy rhyming slang for Marks&#8217; , which would make it more likely to require an apostophe than a plural. There is absolutely no way of proving this, but it just fits in with the feel of a song where the playing-with-various-daft-ways-of-rhyming-or-not-rhyming quotient is higher than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul F</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-1993</guid>
		<description>Two ultra-pedantic M&amp;S comments.  Firstly the &quot;and&quot; should be an ampersand.  Secondly (@Dave F) unless she works at more than one Marks &amp; Spencer store, it must be Marks &amp; Spencer&#039;s.

Apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two ultra-pedantic M&amp;S comments.  Firstly the &#8220;and&#8221; should be an ampersand.  Secondly (@Dave F) unless she works at more than one Marks &amp; Spencer store, it must be Marks &amp; Spencer&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris The Siteowner</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-1985</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris The Siteowner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-1985</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll go for &quot;at Marks And Spencer’s&quot;, thanks. Not sure about the other two though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll go for &#8220;at Marks And Spencer’s&#8221;, thanks. Not sure about the other two though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave F.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/we-would-go-and-see-echo-and-the-bunny/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=601#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>Hi
I reckon it&#039;s:

&quot;She works &lt;b&gt;at&lt;/b&gt; Marks And Spencer’s&quot;

Not sure if M&amp;S should have an apostrophe. Isn&#039;t it just plural &amp; not possessive as has been done for Lech Walesa? I&#039;m willing to be proved wrong on that

&quot;I &lt;b&gt;loved&lt;/b&gt; you more than ever&quot;
The whole of the last verse is sung in the past tense so, as well as sounding like loved, it fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I reckon it&#8217;s:</p>
<p>&#8220;She works <b>at</b> Marks And Spencer’s&#8221;</p>
<p>Not sure if M&amp;S should have an apostrophe. Isn&#8217;t it just plural &amp; not possessive as has been done for Lech Walesa? I&#8217;m willing to be proved wrong on that</p>
<p>&#8220;I <b>loved</b> you more than ever&#8221;<br />
The whole of the last verse is sung in the past tense so, as well as sounding like loved, it fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.chrisrand.com @ 2010-09-09 05:08:26 -->