<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Well we&#8217;ve both seen your personalised reg plates</title> <atom:link href="http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/</link> <description>Busking this at Embankment Tube tomorrow</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:30:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Tonto's Expanding Waist Band</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link> <dc:creator>Tonto's Expanding Waist Band</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:03:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-3111</guid> <description>As Frank Zappa said once, &#039;The crux of the Biscuit is the apostrophe&#039;... Apart from that, love the off-kilter-or-nothing guitar solo!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Frank Zappa said once, &#8216;The crux of the Biscuit is the apostrophe&#8217;&#8230; Apart from that, love the off-kilter-or-nothing guitar solo!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2946</link> <dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:19:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2946</guid> <description>I&#039;m convinced it&#039;s
&quot;And the Laboritoires Garnier gall&quot;
Nothing else makes any sense</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m convinced it&#8217;s</p><p>&#8220;And the Laboritoires Garnier gall&#8221;</p><p>Nothing else makes any sense</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris H</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2686</link> <dc:creator>Chris H</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:33:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2686</guid> <description>Sorry to ressurect this one but I originally thought it was
&#039;And the Laboratoire Garnier gall&#039; in recognition of the sometimes unblievable claims made by said company about the qualities of their products.  On a closer listen just now it seems sound like &#039;at the&#039; but also could be &#039;et le/la&#039; (not sure whether feminine or masculine) and thus conitnues the french language theme.
I might be wrong........</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to ressurect this one but I originally thought it was<br
/> &#8216;And the Laboratoire Garnier gall&#8217; in recognition of the sometimes unblievable claims made by said company about the qualities of their products.  On a closer listen just now it seems sound like &#8216;at the&#8217; but also could be &#8216;et le/la&#8217; (not sure whether feminine or masculine) and thus conitnues the french language theme.</p><p>I might be wrong&#8230;&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Exford</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2677</link> <dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:45:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2677</guid> <description>Very gracious of you. A simple apostrophe causing you, and us all, to ponder our own mortality. Surely Blackwell and Milton would be equally proud.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very gracious of you. A simple apostrophe causing you, and us all, to ponder our own mortality. Surely Blackwell and Milton would be equally proud.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris The Siteowner</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2676</link> <dc:creator>Chris The Siteowner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:35:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2676</guid> <description>I&#039;m tossing in the towel here, life&#039;s too short.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m tossing in the towel here, life&#8217;s too short.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Exford</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2675</link> <dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:12:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2675</guid> <description>I&#039;m sure it&#039;s &#039;you foisted&#039;, Past Simple. There is a precedent - another song a while back where you&#039;d inserted an extra &quot;ve&quot;, getting carried away after a couple of the preceding verbs had been in Present Perfect, but I can&#039;t remember which song now - you corrected it anyway.
I once foisted a book on him, but fortunately it was well after this song came out and anyway I&#039;d already read it. So I think I get away with that one.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/shes-on-the-isle-of-thanet/#comment-2623&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Having raised the goalkeepers&#039; apostrophe in another place&lt;/a&gt;, I suppose I should give my view. Many amateur teams seem to have a spare set of gloves in the kitbag for use either by the regular goalie, the emergency goalie, the rotating goalie, the ringer from The Plough, etc... . but they are thought of as the gloves of the goalkeeper, singular, of the team. Of the role. Not really of the person. The tossing of the gloves by the manager/captain is often in my experience the first dread moment when the allocation of the role is done.
A case can be made for all three possibilities, I agree Chris. But in the spirit of Milton, this is likely to have been a one-off game between good and evil, with the destiny of mankind at stake, and only one goalkeeper responsible for the ultimate damnation of the human soul, and thereby of the appearance of motorway cones, Davina, and other sins.
So I do believe that &quot;goalkeeper&#039;s&quot; does the job slightly better.
Not that I give as much of a toss as I do about &#039;lost&#039; (capitals in the title, lower case in the text please).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s &#8216;you foisted&#8217;, Past Simple. There is a precedent &#8211; another song a while back where you&#8217;d inserted an extra &#8220;ve&#8221;, getting carried away after a couple of the preceding verbs had been in Present Perfect, but I can&#8217;t remember which song now &#8211; you corrected it anyway.</p><p>I once foisted a book on him, but fortunately it was well after this song came out and anyway I&#8217;d already read it. So I think I get away with that one.</p><p><a
href="http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/shes-on-the-isle-of-thanet/#comment-2623">Having raised the goalkeepers&#8217; apostrophe in another place</a>, I suppose I should give my view. Many amateur teams seem to have a spare set of gloves in the kitbag for use either by the regular goalie, the emergency goalie, the rotating goalie, the ringer from The Plough, etc&#8230; . but they are thought of as the gloves of the goalkeeper, singular, of the team. Of the role. Not really of the person. The tossing of the gloves by the manager/captain is often in my experience the first dread moment when the allocation of the role is done.</p><p>A case can be made for all three possibilities, I agree Chris. But in the spirit of Milton, this is likely to have been a one-off game between good and evil, with the destiny of mankind at stake, and only one goalkeeper responsible for the ultimate damnation of the human soul, and thereby of the appearance of motorway cones, Davina, and other sins.</p><p>So I do believe that &#8220;goalkeeper&#8217;s&#8221; does the job slightly better.</p><p>Not that I give as much of a toss as I do about &#8216;lost&#8217; (capitals in the title, lower case in the text please).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fredorrarci</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link> <dc:creator>Fredorrarci</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:34:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2605</guid> <description>Somehow, it&#039;s utterly unsurprising that Venison has gone down that road.
Tostare: My thinking was that they&#039;d be stoned enough to conceive the plan, but too stoned to execute it properly. It probably doesn&#039;t stand up to scrutiny, which is one reason I was wrong.
Dave F: I don&#039;t think &#039;for&#039; is redundant. Imagine replacing &quot;stone&quot; with &quot;blame&quot; in &quot;Is it you who&#039;s to stone for the motorway cone...&quot;
While I&#039;m here: this song contains one of the best anti-solos ever, up there with &#039;Boredom&#039; and &#039;Canyons of Your Mind&#039;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, it&#8217;s utterly unsurprising that Venison has gone down that road.</p><p>Tostare: My thinking was that they&#8217;d be stoned enough to conceive the plan, but too stoned to execute it properly. It probably doesn&#8217;t stand up to scrutiny, which is one reason I was wrong.</p><p>Dave F: I don&#8217;t think &#8216;for&#8217; is redundant. Imagine replacing &#8220;stone&#8221; with &#8220;blame&#8221; in &#8220;Is it you who&#8217;s to stone for the motorway cone&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>While I&#8217;m here: this song contains one of the best anti-solos ever, up there with &#8216;Boredom&#8217; and &#8216;Canyons of Your Mind&#8217;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave F.</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2568</link> <dc:creator>Dave F.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2568</guid> <description>Hi
I&#039;m going with Mr. Exford on the lower case L.
Also &#039;Ah regain...&#039;
I think it is the verb &#039;to stone&#039; but that seems to make &#039;for&#039; redundant?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br
/> I&#8217;m going with Mr. Exford on the lower case L.</p><p>Also &#8216;Ah regain&#8230;&#8217;</p><p>I think it is the verb &#8216;to stone&#8217; but that seems to make &#8216;for&#8217; redundant?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neil G</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2566</link> <dc:creator>Neil G</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 07:00:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2566</guid> <description>Fascinating!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Exford</title><link>http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/well-weve-both-seen-your-personalised-reg-plates/comment-page-1/#comment-2549</link> <dc:creator>Charles Exford</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 10:44:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisrand.com/hmhb/?p=676#comment-2549</guid> <description>Its&#039;s &#039;to stone&#039; : NB occasionaly goes for half-rhymes when it&#039;s funny, but mostly he seems to love yer actual good old-fashioned full rhyme, with the more internal rhyme the better. Stone-cone, McCall, Gaul, that sort of thing.
&#039;To blame&#039; wouldn&#039;t rhyme (nor would &#039;goal&#039;).  Anyway, retribution in the songs often takes projectile form: flying bricks, figs, and in this case the miscreant is to be stoned for inventing the motorway cone and deciding that putting certain people on telly is a good idea. Suitably biblical.
He&#039;s obsessed with eschatology and retribution in so many songs: divine retribution in everything from Dickie Davies Eyes to Evening of Swing to  Problem Chimp to Bottlneck, social retribution in a good many &#039;list of tw*ts&#039; songs like Breaking News and this one.
Barry Venison ? In 2004, he emigrated to Redondo Beach, California, where he is apparently enjoying life as a property developer in Orange County, and has taken on the stereotypical “California Lifestyle.” According to one reporter who met him recently, “He looks more like 23 than 43, and has a deep brown tan and is covered in tattoos. He’s been teetotal for about five years, and gets up at 6am every day and does yoga. Then he waxes up his surfboard and heads out to catch some waves.” He also has other business interests, and has recently worked the US Tennis Association summer tour for Hawk-Eye Innovations, which is a ball-tracking technology that essentially tells if the ball is in or out of play.
Barry Venison may not have been included in the official lfc.tv  list of “100 Players Who Shook The Kop”, but he did make it onto The Liverpool Way’s “10 Players Who Shook The Kop With Laughter.”
(Neil - that was the edited version).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its&#8217;s &#8216;to stone&#8217; : NB occasionaly goes for half-rhymes when it&#8217;s funny, but mostly he seems to love yer actual good old-fashioned full rhyme, with the more internal rhyme the better. Stone-cone, McCall, Gaul, that sort of thing.</p><p>&#8216;To blame&#8217; wouldn&#8217;t rhyme (nor would &#8216;goal&#8217;).  Anyway, retribution in the songs often takes projectile form: flying bricks, figs, and in this case the miscreant is to be stoned for inventing the motorway cone and deciding that putting certain people on telly is a good idea. Suitably biblical.</p><p>He&#8217;s obsessed with eschatology and retribution in so many songs: divine retribution in everything from Dickie Davies Eyes to Evening of Swing to  Problem Chimp to Bottlneck, social retribution in a good many &#8216;list of tw*ts&#8217; songs like Breaking News and this one.</p><p>Barry Venison ? In 2004, he emigrated to Redondo Beach, California, where he is apparently enjoying life as a property developer in Orange County, and has taken on the stereotypical “California Lifestyle.” According to one reporter who met him recently, “He looks more like 23 than 43, and has a deep brown tan and is covered in tattoos. He’s been teetotal for about five years, and gets up at 6am every day and does yoga. Then he waxes up his surfboard and heads out to catch some waves.” He also has other business interests, and has recently worked the US Tennis Association summer tour for Hawk-Eye Innovations, which is a ball-tracking technology that essentially tells if the ball is in or out of play.</p><p>Barry Venison may not have been included in the official lfc.tv  list of “100 Players Who Shook The Kop”, but he did make it onto The Liverpool Way’s “10 Players Who Shook The Kop With Laughter.”</p><p>(Neil &#8211; that was the edited version).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
